Equation of state of a natural upper-mantle rock at conditions of the Earth's lower mantle, and evidence for mantle layering


K. K. M. Lee $^{a}$, B. O'Neill, W. R. Panero $^{b}$, S-H. Shim $^{a}$, L. R. Benedetti $^{c}$ and R. Jeanloz $^{a}$

$^{a}$ Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, 94720-4767, USA $^{b}$ Department of Geological Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109, USA $^{c}$ CEA, Bruyeres-Le-Chatel, France 91680

leeka@uclink.berkeley.edu


High-resolution x-ray diffraction to 107 GPa on an undepleted natural peridotite -- of pyrolite composition and representative of the Earth's upper-mantle -- transforms to the assemblage $\sim$76 ($\pm$ 2)\% (Mg$_{0.88}$ Fe$^{2+}$$_{0.05}$ Fe$^{3+}$$_{0.01}$ Al$_{0.12}$ Si$_{0.94}$)O$_{3}$ orthorhombic perovskite by volume (at zero pressure), 17 ($\pm$ 2)\% (Mg$_{0.80}$ Fe$_{0.20}$)O magnesiow\"{u}stite and 7 ($\pm$ 1)\% CaSiO$_{3}$ perovskite at lower-mantle conditions.  The room-temperature bulk properties ($\rho$$_{0}$ = 4.13 ($\pm$ 0.02) g/cm$^{3}$, isothermal bulk modulus K$_{0T}$ = 247 ($\pm$ 21) GPa and pressure derivative K$_{0T}$' = 4.01 ($\pm$ 0.67)) of this high-pressure assemblage, together with a range of estimates of thermal properties of the constituent minerals, lead to quantitative predictions of density ($\pm$ 0.5\% uncertainty) and bulk modulus ($\pm$ 3\% uncertainty) for the high-pressure assemblage at lower-mantle pressures and temperatures.  The values that we obtain are inconsistent with seismological constraints on the density, bulk modulus and temperature of the lower mantle.  Therefore, we propose a lower mantle differing in composition (e.g., richer in iron) from current estimates for the upper mantle, implying some amount of segregation between the upper and lower mantle.


Back to the list of abstracts.
Back to main page.