next up previous
Next: Search for Short-period Discontinuity Up: Characterization of Global Seismograms Previous: Long-Period Travel-Time Curves

Comparison of SV and SH residuals

Observations consistent with an anisotropic upper mantle are seen in residual histograms of the transverse- and the radial-component S and SS autopicks at ranges near the upper-mantle triplications (Figure 9). On average, the times are offset with SH arriving slightly ahead of SV. Two properties of the observed travel-time discrepancy suggest that it arises from upper-mantle anisotropy--the offset is observed only for shallow turning rays and on average the offset is 3.6 s larger for the SS phase than for the S phase. In transversely isotropic material, the SH and SV velocities approach each other as the rays become vertical; thus shallow anisotropy is hard to detect at long ranges since the rays are steeply dipping through the anisotropy. At closer ranges (e.g., 17tex2html_wrap_inline958 to 23tex2html_wrap_inline958 for S and 37tex2html_wrap_inline958 to 43tex2html_wrap_inline958 for SS), the rays travel more horizontally through the anisotropy and are affected more strongly. For example, the difference in travel-time between SV and SH waves (calculated from PREM [ Dziewonski and Anderson, 1981]) is as large as 5 s for ranges between 15tex2html_wrap_inline958 and 20tex2html_wrap_inline958\; however, at 30tex2html_wrap_inline958 the difference decreases to about 1 s. The SH-SV travel-time difference is greater for the SS phase than it is for the S phase since SS turns twice in the upper mantle.

 figure193

SH versus SV travel-time differences were previously noted by Gee and Jordan [1988] in multiple S phases for Eurasian paths, and are seen in the automatic-gain-control waveform stacks of Shearer [1991b]. Transverse isotropy in the upper mantle was originally proposed to explain differences in Love and Rayleigh wave observations [e.g., McEvilly, 1964; Anderson, 1966; Forsyth, 1975]. In addition, body wave studies indicate azimuthal upper-mantle anisotropy, both from travel-time observations [e.g., Hess, 1964; Raitt et al., 1969; Shearer and Orcutt, 1986] and shear-wave splitting observations [e.g., Ando et al., 1983; Vinnik, 1984; Silver and Chan, 1988]. Note that even if upper-mantle anisotropy is locally azimuthal, global averages will still appear transversely isotropic [e.g., Regan and Anderson, 1984].


next up previous
Next: Search for Short-period Discontinuity Up: Characterization of Global Seismograms Previous: Long-Period Travel-Time Curves

Paul Earle
Sun Mar 2 11:57:40 PST 1997