Next: Noise
evaluation Up: The
RAMESSES Experiment III: Previous: The
experiment
Data reduction
Except at the closest ranges the signal is at or below the receiver noise
level and synchronous detection or stacking must be employed. Source fields
must therefore be well characterised. The intention was to transmit frequencies
of 0.25 Hz, 8 Hz and 64 Hz but a transmitter malfunction
modified this.
High voltage 256 Hz power from the ship is fully rectified and the
resulting half sinusoids switched in DASI to give blocks of positive and
negative polarity. The transmission frequency is controlled by switching
the polarity of the rectified signal after a specified number of zero crossings
of the 256 Hz carrier have been detected. A preset program within DASI
determines the specific frequencies and duration of each frequency burst.
Due to instabilities in the 256 Hz carrier signal and errors in the
part of DASI controlling the zero crossing count, the polarity of the rectified
sinusoids was switched too frequently, thus increasing the frequency of
the signal and shortening the length of single frequency bursts. The switching
error was larger for the positive going half sinusoids, making the transmitted
waveform slightly asymmetric.
The DASI logger, which monitored the transmitted signal, logged for at most
three minutes in every half hour, and so provided an incomplete record of
transmission. A source model was constructed by interpolating between points
at which logger records were available, supplemented by short range data
from instrument Quail during the first tow. Transmission frequencies during
the first tow were 0.35 Hz and 11 Hz, in burst lengths of 92 seconds.
During the second tow the transmission frequency drifted between 0.69 Hz
and 0.76 Hz, with an average of 0.75 Hz, in bursts of 44 seconds.
A least squares fit at the transmission frequency during each burst was
used to extract the amplitude of the fundamental sinusoid from the raw time
series recorded by each receiver channel, and to estimate the error on this
value. The phase of the transmitter changed between bursts by an unknown
amount, making it impossible to stack several bursts to improve the signal
to noise ratio. Because of this, none of the long range data from the LEM
instruments, which was at or beneath the ambient noise level, could be extracted.
The LEMURs employed a stacking algorithm to reduce data volume, so no data
could be recovered from these instruments.
Next: Noise evaluation
Up: The RAMESSES
Experiment III: Previous: The
experiment
Go to first page
Lucy MacGregor
Fri Aug 15 08:48:04 PDT 1997